We have moved to GitHub Issues
You are viewing the read-only archive of Umbraco's issue tracker. To create new issues, please head over to GitHub Issues.
Make sure to read the blog posts announcing the move for more information.
Created by Lars-Erik Aabech 23 Aug 2017, 16:40:46 Updated by Lars-Erik Aabech 04 Dec 2017, 19:27:36
Relates to: U4-9990
I'll try adding document type overrides for the client side content type template configurations. Will add link to PR if I get it done.
I'll try to get around to a PR to the docs for configuring this.
And soz to @claus for brushing his suggestion off. This was quite easy. ;) (I'll blame fatigue and drunkenness)
@lars-erik awesome :D yeah didn't think it would be that much trouble to do it!
I think this is the PR then ? https://github.com/umbraco/Umbraco-CMS/pull/2146
@madsrasmussen part of this process is what I mentioned to you before about how it's possible to inject 'config' values into the angular app via plugins to alter behavior instead of relying on static config parameters.
Yes, see first comment. ;)
Reg. "injection". It's worth considering whether there should be a default one that's extended by the injectable one. Or maybe feed the default to the "injector" so it can be extended in the custom plugin. In it's most crude state the implementor will have to duplicate the entire config. The config for content templates is so simple it doesn't much matter, but in other cases it's worth contemplating.
@madsrasmussen @Shandem This planned at all?
Priority: Normal
Type: Feature (request)
State: Open
Assignee:
Difficulty: Normal
Category:
Backwards Compatible: True
Fix Submitted: Pull request
Affected versions:
Due in version:
Sprint:
Story Points:
Cycle: 4